NAT for external LAN port with private Addresss

dankoondankoon
in Firebox - Other

Hello,

I have a somewhat strange setup here.

We are in a building together with a partner company, they have a camera security system and so do we.

The system is the same. Now, as this company monitors the entrance area etc., they have provided us with a LAN port which we are supposed to include in “our” infrastructure.

Now I wanted to let the traffic go through our firewall. As I still have a free port there, I wanted to use it for this. However, the problem is that you can access the camera via the LAN port provided, with a subnet that we already use.

I then tried to configure the interface as External, Optional etc. in order to access the IP address with a SNAT via port 443. Unfortunately, this has not worked so far. I have an error in my thinking somewhere and am currently stuck.

The LAN port goes into an untagged port in a separate VLAN on the switch. The intention would then be to be able to access the camera via a dedicated port.

Do you have any ideas or is this approach completely wrong?

Comments

  • Bruce_BriggsBruce_Briggs

    You can't have the same subnet on different firewall interfaces when in Mixed Routing mode.
    The only exceptions to this are:
    . if you have multiple interfaces set up as a bridge group
    . if you have the same VLAN bridged across 2 interfaces

    So you could a bridge group - but then you can't control what goes across the bridge group firewall interfaces. So this is not a good solution.

    If the goal is to have them monitor your camera feed, have them access the camera via the public IP addr of you firewall.
    Set up a policy allowing this using SNAT to the private IP addr of the camera, From: their public IP addr.

Sign In to comment.